Today, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that is normally used for even ten per cent of its possible.
What's it to get the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", if the person has fastened his wrist into the max following a dip along with a couple of strokes, return immediately to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their main use it's merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the debut of the so-called divers of this contemporary age that dates back into the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the category can boast, was already tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of their well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famed documentary -movie also winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I believe that even non-fans will remember well one of the first Rolex Submariner appear several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the film Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist became a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown protector shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are just a couple of the very first cases that reveal - fiction or fact - for more than fifty years, the press - driven by the watch sector - determined the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day the manufacturers in regards to describing their versions started to use the term: "appropriate for any event".
The 007 shift, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanics of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose function was played with the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their real use within this massive family whose roots would simply deal with "hard greater than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to dread even once you have to wash the hands.
However, a true diver's watch has generally always had a lot to say technically speaking. Let's just mention the characteristics and constructive philosophies of these fascinating references.
I have a long-standing friend who is a professional diver and who, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub Has to Be able to ensure these performances:
Excellent visibility during the dive
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate verification of the operation of the device that reports the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficacy of its motion, either quartz or mechanical
However, the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches need to adhere to certain rules such as those described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal use, what we all know is the greatest, the best sub could be in the end best dive watches under 300 a watchable to offer attributes much milder and easier to handle.
I recall that in order to only immerse the surface in maximum safety, a timepiece should be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but this isn't so when it's done a trivial swim in the sea. It would be better to avoid here diving, especially if ours could not even count to a screw-on crown better still when secure on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
And the safety on the waterproof status of the underwater timepieces?
Precisely for those who would never use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to have the ability to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a blatant condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why even an abyssal super dive watch might have to be hurried into a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism indefinitely. This function currently exists, but on very few models, which honestly I don't understand why.
You might have worn your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown tightly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver somewhere safe or obligatorily create a closing but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen a little 'of problems related to the time that must meet the water, and given the necessary advice, I reveal you that - to date - are for me the best dive watches.
They are not many: I have split them into two classes. The sequence in which they appear does not represent any ranking.